Search > Results

You searched for: 2025 (Year of publication)

Showing 1 - 13 of 13

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV240045 5/6 Homo sapiens HEK293T Filtration
UF
Pauwels J 2025 75%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Pauwels J, Van de Steene T, Van de Velde J, De Muyer F, De Pauw D, Baeke F, Eyckerman S, Gevaert K
Journal
Mol Cell Proteomics
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the ex (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the extracellular environment, are gaining substantial interest due to their involvement in cellular homeostasis and their contribution to disease pathology. The latter in particular has led to an exponential increase in interest in EVs as they are considered to be circulating packages containing potential biomarkers and are also a possible biological means to deliver drugs in a cell-specific manner. However, several challenges hamper straightforward proteome analysis of EVs as they are generally low abundant and reside in complex biological matrices. These matrices typically contain abundant proteins at concentrations that vastly exceed the concentrations of proteins found in the EV proteome. Therefore, extensive EV isolation and purification protocols are imperative and many have been developed, including (density) ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion, and precipitation methods. Here, we describe filter-aided extracellular vesicle enrichment (FAEVEr) as an approach based on 300 kDa molecular weight cutoff filtration that allows the processing of multiple samples in parallel within a reasonable time frame and at moderate cost. We demonstrate that FAEVEr is capable of quantitatively retaining EV particles on filters, while allowing extensive washing with the mild detergent Tween-20 to remove interfering non-EV proteins. The retained particles are directly lysed on the filter for a complete recovery of the EV protein cargo toward proteome analysis. Here, we validate and optimize FAEVEr on recombinant EV material and apply it on conditioned medium as well as on complex bovine serum, human plasma, and urine. Our results indicate that EVs isolated from MCF7 cells cultured with or without serum have a drastic different proteome because of nutrient deprivation. (hide)
EV-METRIC
75% (96th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Gag-eGFP OE
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Protein markers
EV: Gag-eGFP
non-EV: bovine proteins
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HEK293T
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Separation Method
Filtration steps
0.2 or 0.22µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
300
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
Gag-eGFP
Not detected contaminants
Calnexin
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mode
Reported size (nm)
128
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.50E+08
EM
EM-type
Scanning-EM/ Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV240045 6/6 Homo sapiens HEK293T Filtration
UF
Tween wash
Pauwels J 2025 75%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Pauwels J, Van de Steene T, Van de Velde J, De Muyer F, De Pauw D, Baeke F, Eyckerman S, Gevaert K
Journal
Mol Cell Proteomics
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the ex (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the extracellular environment, are gaining substantial interest due to their involvement in cellular homeostasis and their contribution to disease pathology. The latter in particular has led to an exponential increase in interest in EVs as they are considered to be circulating packages containing potential biomarkers and are also a possible biological means to deliver drugs in a cell-specific manner. However, several challenges hamper straightforward proteome analysis of EVs as they are generally low abundant and reside in complex biological matrices. These matrices typically contain abundant proteins at concentrations that vastly exceed the concentrations of proteins found in the EV proteome. Therefore, extensive EV isolation and purification protocols are imperative and many have been developed, including (density) ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion, and precipitation methods. Here, we describe filter-aided extracellular vesicle enrichment (FAEVEr) as an approach based on 300 kDa molecular weight cutoff filtration that allows the processing of multiple samples in parallel within a reasonable time frame and at moderate cost. We demonstrate that FAEVEr is capable of quantitatively retaining EV particles on filters, while allowing extensive washing with the mild detergent Tween-20 to remove interfering non-EV proteins. The retained particles are directly lysed on the filter for a complete recovery of the EV protein cargo toward proteome analysis. Here, we validate and optimize FAEVEr on recombinant EV material and apply it on conditioned medium as well as on complex bovine serum, human plasma, and urine. Our results indicate that EVs isolated from MCF7 cells cultured with or without serum have a drastic different proteome because of nutrient deprivation. (hide)
EV-METRIC
75% (96th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Gag-eGFP OE
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Tween wash
Protein markers
EV: Gag-eGFP
non-EV: bovine proteins
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HEK293T
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Separation Method
Filtration steps
0.2 or 0.22µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
300
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Other
Name other separation method
Tween wash
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
Gag-eGFP
Not detected contaminants
Calnexin
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mode
Reported size (nm)
156
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 8.30E+07
EM
EM-type
Scanning-EM/ Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV240164 2/5 Homo sapiens HeLa (d)(U)C
DG
Xiong J 2025 56%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Xiong J, Yang L, Nan X, Zhu S, Yan M, Xiang S, Zhang L, Li Q, Yang C, Wang X, Wei N, Chen H, Si Y, Cao S, Ye J
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to (show more...)Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to public health. Currently, there is no specific therapeutic agent available for JEV infection, primarily due to the complexity of its infection mechanism and pathogenesis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been known to play an important role in viral infection, but their specific functions in JEV infection remain unknown. Here, ultracentrifugation in combination with density gradient centrifugation was conducted to purify EVs from JEV-infected cells. The purified EVs were found to be infectious, with virions observed inside the EVs. Furthermore, our study showed the formation process of virion-containing EVs both in vitro and in vivo, which involved the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the cell membrane, leading to the release of virion-containing intraluminal vesicles into the extracellular space. Further studies revealed that EVs played a crucial role in JEV propagation by facilitating viral entry and assembly-release. Furthermore, EVs assisted JEV in evading the neutralizing antibodies and promoted viral capability to cross the blood-brain and placental barriers. Moreover, in vivo experiments demonstrated that EVs were beneficial for JEV infection and pathogenicity. Taken together, our findings highlight the significant contribution of EVs in JEV infection and provide valuable insights into JEV pathogenesis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
56% (89th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Japanese encephalitis virus-infected
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Protein markers
EV: CD63/ CD81
non-EV: Calnexin
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.15
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biomarker/Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HeLa
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
4h at 150,000g
Cell viability (%)
90
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Swinging bucket
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
70%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.5
Sample volume (mL)
3.5
Orientation
Top-down
Speed (g)
100,000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
38
Pelleting: speed (g)
100,000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ CD81
Not detected contaminants
Calnexin
Characterization: RNA analysis
RNA analysis
Type
(RT)-(q)PCR
Proteinase treatment
No
RNAse treatment
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
150-300
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV240164 3/5 Sus scrofa domesticus PIEC (d)(U)C
DG
Xiong J 2025 56%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Xiong J, Yang L, Nan X, Zhu S, Yan M, Xiang S, Zhang L, Li Q, Yang C, Wang X, Wei N, Chen H, Si Y, Cao S, Ye J
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to (show more...)Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to public health. Currently, there is no specific therapeutic agent available for JEV infection, primarily due to the complexity of its infection mechanism and pathogenesis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been known to play an important role in viral infection, but their specific functions in JEV infection remain unknown. Here, ultracentrifugation in combination with density gradient centrifugation was conducted to purify EVs from JEV-infected cells. The purified EVs were found to be infectious, with virions observed inside the EVs. Furthermore, our study showed the formation process of virion-containing EVs both in vitro and in vivo, which involved the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the cell membrane, leading to the release of virion-containing intraluminal vesicles into the extracellular space. Further studies revealed that EVs played a crucial role in JEV propagation by facilitating viral entry and assembly-release. Furthermore, EVs assisted JEV in evading the neutralizing antibodies and promoted viral capability to cross the blood-brain and placental barriers. Moreover, in vivo experiments demonstrated that EVs were beneficial for JEV infection and pathogenicity. Taken together, our findings highlight the significant contribution of EVs in JEV infection and provide valuable insights into JEV pathogenesis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
56% (89th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Japanese encephalitis virus-infected
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ CD81
non-EV: Calnexin
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.15
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biomarker/Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Sus scrofa domesticus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
PIEC
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
4h at 150,000g
Cell viability (%)
80
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Swinging bucket
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
70%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.5
Sample volume (mL)
3.5
Orientation
Top-down
Speed (g)
100,000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
38
Pelleting: speed (g)
100,000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
TSG101/ CD81
Not detected contaminants
Calnexin
Characterization: RNA analysis
RNA analysis
Type
(RT)-(q)PCR
Proteinase treatment
No
RNAse treatment
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
150-300
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV240164 4/5 Mesocricetus auratus BHK-21 (d)(U)C
DG
Xiong J 2025 56%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Xiong J, Yang L, Nan X, Zhu S, Yan M, Xiang S, Zhang L, Li Q, Yang C, Wang X, Wei N, Chen H, Si Y, Cao S, Ye J
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to (show more...)Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to public health. Currently, there is no specific therapeutic agent available for JEV infection, primarily due to the complexity of its infection mechanism and pathogenesis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been known to play an important role in viral infection, but their specific functions in JEV infection remain unknown. Here, ultracentrifugation in combination with density gradient centrifugation was conducted to purify EVs from JEV-infected cells. The purified EVs were found to be infectious, with virions observed inside the EVs. Furthermore, our study showed the formation process of virion-containing EVs both in vitro and in vivo, which involved the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the cell membrane, leading to the release of virion-containing intraluminal vesicles into the extracellular space. Further studies revealed that EVs played a crucial role in JEV propagation by facilitating viral entry and assembly-release. Furthermore, EVs assisted JEV in evading the neutralizing antibodies and promoted viral capability to cross the blood-brain and placental barriers. Moreover, in vivo experiments demonstrated that EVs were beneficial for JEV infection and pathogenicity. Taken together, our findings highlight the significant contribution of EVs in JEV infection and provide valuable insights into JEV pathogenesis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
56% (89th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Japanese encephalitis virus-infected
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Protein markers
EV: CD81/ Alix
non-EV: Calnexin
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.15
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biomarker/Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Mesocricetus auratus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
BHK-21
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
4h at 150,000g
Cell viability (%)
80
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Swinging bucket
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
70%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.5
Sample volume (mL)
3.5
Orientation
Top-down
Speed (g)
100,000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
38
Pelleting: speed (g)
100,000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD81/ Alix
Not detected contaminants
Calnexin
Characterization: RNA analysis
RNA analysis
Type
(RT)-(q)PCR
Proteinase treatment
No
RNAse treatment
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
150-300
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV250039 1/2 Homo sapiens Stool DG
Filtration
(d)(U)C
SEC (commercial)
UF
Mishra S 2025 50%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Mishra S, Tejesvi MV, Hekkala J, Turunen J, Kandikanti N, Kaisanlahti A, Suokas M, Leppä S, Vihinen P, Kuitunen H, Sunela K, Koivunen J, Jukkola A, Kalashnikov I, Auvinen P, Kääriäinen OS, Peñate Medina T, Peñate Medina O, Saarnio J, Meriläinen S, Rautio T, Aro R, Häivälä R, Suojanen J, Laine M, Erawijattari PP, Lahti L, Karihtala P, Ruuska TS, Reunanen J
Journal
J Adv Res
Abstract
Gut microbiome-derived nanoparticles, known as bacterial extracellular vesicles (bEVs), have garnere (show more...)Gut microbiome-derived nanoparticles, known as bacterial extracellular vesicles (bEVs), have garnered interest as promising tools for studying the link between the gut microbiome and human health. The diverse composition of bEVs, including their proteins, mRNAs, metabolites, and lipids, makes them useful for investigating diseases such as cancer. However, conventional approaches for studying gut microbiome composition alone may not be accurate in deciphering host-gut microbiome communication. In clinical microbiome research, there is a gap in the knowledge on the role of bEVs in solid tumor patients. (hide)
EV-METRIC
50% (76th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Stool
Sample origin
Patients with solid tumor
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density gradient
Filtration
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Size-exclusion chromatography (commercial)
Ultrafiltration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
EV density (g/ml)
-
Show all info
Study aim
Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Stool
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
40%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
10
Sample volume (mL)
0.2
Orientation
Top-down
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
10
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Filtration steps
Larger than 0.45 µm/ Between 0.22 and 0.45 µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Other
Name other separation method
Size-exclusion chromatography (commercial)
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Proteomics database
PRIDE
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
202
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.08E+08
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV250039 2/2 Homo sapiens Stool DG
Filtration
(d)(U)C
SEC (commercial)
Mishra S 2025 50%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Mishra S, Tejesvi MV, Hekkala J, Turunen J, Kandikanti N, Kaisanlahti A, Suokas M, Leppä S, Vihinen P, Kuitunen H, Sunela K, Koivunen J, Jukkola A, Kalashnikov I, Auvinen P, Kääriäinen OS, Peñate Medina T, Peñate Medina O, Saarnio J, Meriläinen S, Rautio T, Aro R, Häivälä R, Suojanen J, Laine M, Erawijattari PP, Lahti L, Karihtala P, Ruuska TS, Reunanen J
Journal
J Adv Res
Abstract
Gut microbiome-derived nanoparticles, known as bacterial extracellular vesicles (bEVs), have garnere (show more...)Gut microbiome-derived nanoparticles, known as bacterial extracellular vesicles (bEVs), have garnered interest as promising tools for studying the link between the gut microbiome and human health. The diverse composition of bEVs, including their proteins, mRNAs, metabolites, and lipids, makes them useful for investigating diseases such as cancer. However, conventional approaches for studying gut microbiome composition alone may not be accurate in deciphering host-gut microbiome communication. In clinical microbiome research, there is a gap in the knowledge on the role of bEVs in solid tumor patients. (hide)
EV-METRIC
50% (76th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Stool
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density gradient
Filtration
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Size-exclusion chromatography (commercial)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
EV density (g/ml)
-
Show all info
Study aim
Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Stool
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
40%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
10
Sample volume (mL)
0.2
Orientation
Top-down
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
10
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Filtration steps
Larger than 0.45 µm/ Between 0.22 and 0.45 µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Other
Name other separation method
Size-exclusion chromatography (commercial)
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Proteomics database
PRIDE
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
168.9
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 2.52E+08
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV240045 3/6 Homo sapiens MCF7 Filtration
UF
Tween wash
Pauwels J 2025 50%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Pauwels J, Van de Steene T, Van de Velde J, De Muyer F, De Pauw D, Baeke F, Eyckerman S, Gevaert K
Journal
Mol Cell Proteomics
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the ex (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the extracellular environment, are gaining substantial interest due to their involvement in cellular homeostasis and their contribution to disease pathology. The latter in particular has led to an exponential increase in interest in EVs as they are considered to be circulating packages containing potential biomarkers and are also a possible biological means to deliver drugs in a cell-specific manner. However, several challenges hamper straightforward proteome analysis of EVs as they are generally low abundant and reside in complex biological matrices. These matrices typically contain abundant proteins at concentrations that vastly exceed the concentrations of proteins found in the EV proteome. Therefore, extensive EV isolation and purification protocols are imperative and many have been developed, including (density) ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion, and precipitation methods. Here, we describe filter-aided extracellular vesicle enrichment (FAEVEr) as an approach based on 300 kDa molecular weight cutoff filtration that allows the processing of multiple samples in parallel within a reasonable time frame and at moderate cost. We demonstrate that FAEVEr is capable of quantitatively retaining EV particles on filters, while allowing extensive washing with the mild detergent Tween-20 to remove interfering non-EV proteins. The retained particles are directly lysed on the filter for a complete recovery of the EV protein cargo toward proteome analysis. Here, we validate and optimize FAEVEr on recombinant EV material and apply it on conditioned medium as well as on complex bovine serum, human plasma, and urine. Our results indicate that EVs isolated from MCF7 cells cultured with or without serum have a drastic different proteome because of nutrient deprivation. (hide)
EV-METRIC
50% (87th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Tween wash
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: bovine proteins
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MCF7
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Cell viability (%)
95
Cell count
400000
Separation Method
Filtration steps
0.2 or 0.22µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
300
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Other
Name other separation method
Tween wash
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mode
Reported size (nm)
145
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 4.00E+08
EV240164 5/5 Mesocricetus auratus BHK-21 (d)(U)C
DG
Xiong J 2025 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Xiong J, Yang L, Nan X, Zhu S, Yan M, Xiang S, Zhang L, Li Q, Yang C, Wang X, Wei N, Chen H, Si Y, Cao S, Ye J
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to (show more...)Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to public health. Currently, there is no specific therapeutic agent available for JEV infection, primarily due to the complexity of its infection mechanism and pathogenesis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been known to play an important role in viral infection, but their specific functions in JEV infection remain unknown. Here, ultracentrifugation in combination with density gradient centrifugation was conducted to purify EVs from JEV-infected cells. The purified EVs were found to be infectious, with virions observed inside the EVs. Furthermore, our study showed the formation process of virion-containing EVs both in vitro and in vivo, which involved the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the cell membrane, leading to the release of virion-containing intraluminal vesicles into the extracellular space. Further studies revealed that EVs played a crucial role in JEV propagation by facilitating viral entry and assembly-release. Furthermore, EVs assisted JEV in evading the neutralizing antibodies and promoted viral capability to cross the blood-brain and placental barriers. Moreover, in vivo experiments demonstrated that EVs were beneficial for JEV infection and pathogenicity. Taken together, our findings highlight the significant contribution of EVs in JEV infection and provide valuable insights into JEV pathogenesis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.15
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biomarker/Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Mesocricetus auratus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
BHK-21
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
4h at 150,000g
Cell viability (%)
80
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Swinging bucket
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
70%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.5
Sample volume (mL)
3.5
Orientation
Top-down
Speed (g)
100,000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
38
Pelleting: speed (g)
100,000
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV240045 4/6 Homo sapiens HEK293T (d)(U)C
Filtration
Pauwels J 2025 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Pauwels J, Van de Steene T, Van de Velde J, De Muyer F, De Pauw D, Baeke F, Eyckerman S, Gevaert K
Journal
Mol Cell Proteomics
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the ex (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the extracellular environment, are gaining substantial interest due to their involvement in cellular homeostasis and their contribution to disease pathology. The latter in particular has led to an exponential increase in interest in EVs as they are considered to be circulating packages containing potential biomarkers and are also a possible biological means to deliver drugs in a cell-specific manner. However, several challenges hamper straightforward proteome analysis of EVs as they are generally low abundant and reside in complex biological matrices. These matrices typically contain abundant proteins at concentrations that vastly exceed the concentrations of proteins found in the EV proteome. Therefore, extensive EV isolation and purification protocols are imperative and many have been developed, including (density) ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion, and precipitation methods. Here, we describe filter-aided extracellular vesicle enrichment (FAEVEr) as an approach based on 300 kDa molecular weight cutoff filtration that allows the processing of multiple samples in parallel within a reasonable time frame and at moderate cost. We demonstrate that FAEVEr is capable of quantitatively retaining EV particles on filters, while allowing extensive washing with the mild detergent Tween-20 to remove interfering non-EV proteins. The retained particles are directly lysed on the filter for a complete recovery of the EV protein cargo toward proteome analysis. Here, we validate and optimize FAEVEr on recombinant EV material and apply it on conditioned medium as well as on complex bovine serum, human plasma, and urine. Our results indicate that EVs isolated from MCF7 cells cultured with or without serum have a drastic different proteome because of nutrient deprivation. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Gag-eGFP OE
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: bovine proteins
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HEK293T
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
TLA-120.2
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
1
Wash: time (min)
90
Wash: Rotor Type
TLA-120.2
Wash: speed (g)
100000
Filtration steps
0.2 or 0.22µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV240045 1/6 Homo sapiens Blood plasma Filtration
UF
Pauwels J 2025 33%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Pauwels J, Van de Steene T, Van de Velde J, De Muyer F, De Pauw D, Baeke F, Eyckerman S, Gevaert K
Journal
Mol Cell Proteomics
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the ex (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the extracellular environment, are gaining substantial interest due to their involvement in cellular homeostasis and their contribution to disease pathology. The latter in particular has led to an exponential increase in interest in EVs as they are considered to be circulating packages containing potential biomarkers and are also a possible biological means to deliver drugs in a cell-specific manner. However, several challenges hamper straightforward proteome analysis of EVs as they are generally low abundant and reside in complex biological matrices. These matrices typically contain abundant proteins at concentrations that vastly exceed the concentrations of proteins found in the EV proteome. Therefore, extensive EV isolation and purification protocols are imperative and many have been developed, including (density) ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion, and precipitation methods. Here, we describe filter-aided extracellular vesicle enrichment (FAEVEr) as an approach based on 300 kDa molecular weight cutoff filtration that allows the processing of multiple samples in parallel within a reasonable time frame and at moderate cost. We demonstrate that FAEVEr is capable of quantitatively retaining EV particles on filters, while allowing extensive washing with the mild detergent Tween-20 to remove interfering non-EV proteins. The retained particles are directly lysed on the filter for a complete recovery of the EV protein cargo toward proteome analysis. Here, we validate and optimize FAEVEr on recombinant EV material and apply it on conditioned medium as well as on complex bovine serum, human plasma, and urine. Our results indicate that EVs isolated from MCF7 cells cultured with or without serum have a drastic different proteome because of nutrient deprivation. (hide)
EV-METRIC
33% (64th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
Filtration steps
0.2 or 0.22µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
300
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mode
Reported size (nm)
146
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 2.60E+07
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up
EV240045 2/6 Homo sapiens Urine Filtration
UF
Pauwels J 2025 33%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Pauwels J, Van de Steene T, Van de Velde J, De Muyer F, De Pauw D, Baeke F, Eyckerman S, Gevaert K
Journal
Mol Cell Proteomics
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the ex (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-delimited nanovesicles that are secreted by cells into the extracellular environment, are gaining substantial interest due to their involvement in cellular homeostasis and their contribution to disease pathology. The latter in particular has led to an exponential increase in interest in EVs as they are considered to be circulating packages containing potential biomarkers and are also a possible biological means to deliver drugs in a cell-specific manner. However, several challenges hamper straightforward proteome analysis of EVs as they are generally low abundant and reside in complex biological matrices. These matrices typically contain abundant proteins at concentrations that vastly exceed the concentrations of proteins found in the EV proteome. Therefore, extensive EV isolation and purification protocols are imperative and many have been developed, including (density) ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion, and precipitation methods. Here, we describe filter-aided extracellular vesicle enrichment (FAEVEr) as an approach based on 300 kDa molecular weight cutoff filtration that allows the processing of multiple samples in parallel within a reasonable time frame and at moderate cost. We demonstrate that FAEVEr is capable of quantitatively retaining EV particles on filters, while allowing extensive washing with the mild detergent Tween-20 to remove interfering non-EV proteins. The retained particles are directly lysed on the filter for a complete recovery of the EV protein cargo toward proteome analysis. Here, we validate and optimize FAEVEr on recombinant EV material and apply it on conditioned medium as well as on complex bovine serum, human plasma, and urine. Our results indicate that EVs isolated from MCF7 cells cultured with or without serum have a drastic different proteome because of nutrient deprivation. (hide)
EV-METRIC
33% (64th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Urine
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: Albumin/ Uromodulin
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
Filtration steps
0.2 or 0.22µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
300
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV240164 1/5 Homo sapiens HeLa (d)(U)C
IAF
Xiong J 2025 13%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Xiong J, Yang L, Nan X, Zhu S, Yan M, Xiang S, Zhang L, Li Q, Yang C, Wang X, Wei N, Chen H, Si Y, Cao S, Ye J
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to (show more...)Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a neurotropic zoonotic pathogen that poses a serious threat to public health. Currently, there is no specific therapeutic agent available for JEV infection, primarily due to the complexity of its infection mechanism and pathogenesis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been known to play an important role in viral infection, but their specific functions in JEV infection remain unknown. Here, ultracentrifugation in combination with density gradient centrifugation was conducted to purify EVs from JEV-infected cells. The purified EVs were found to be infectious, with virions observed inside the EVs. Furthermore, our study showed the formation process of virion-containing EVs both in vitro and in vivo, which involved the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the cell membrane, leading to the release of virion-containing intraluminal vesicles into the extracellular space. Further studies revealed that EVs played a crucial role in JEV propagation by facilitating viral entry and assembly-release. Furthermore, EVs assisted JEV in evading the neutralizing antibodies and promoted viral capability to cross the blood-brain and placental barriers. Moreover, in vivo experiments demonstrated that EVs were beneficial for JEV infection and pathogenicity. Taken together, our findings highlight the significant contribution of EVs in JEV infection and provide valuable insights into JEV pathogenesis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
13% (34th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Japanese encephalitis virus-infected
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Immunoaffinity capture (non-commercial)
Protein markers
EV: CD63/ CD81
non-EV: Calnexin
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biomarker/Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HeLa
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
4h at 150,000g
Cell viability (%)
90
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Swinging bucket
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Immunoaffinity capture
Selected surface protein(s)
CD63
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ CD81
Not detected contaminants
Calnexin
Characterization: RNA analysis
RNA analysis
Type
(RT)-(q)PCR
Proteinase treatment
No
RNAse treatment
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
250-500
1 - 13 of 13